아이디어 → 단편 영화
영화 만들기

Seedance 2.5 vs Kling 3.0: Which AI Video Model Wins in 2026?

Seedance 2.5 vs Kling 3.0 compared on motion quality, duration, references, audio, motion control and price per second, with a verdict for creators.

기능 비교

기능Seedance 2.5Kling 3.0
Max duration30 seconds15 seconds
Reference images303 elements
Motion controlVia reference videoDedicated mode
Native audioYesOptional, extra cost
720p 5s price (list)$1.80 standard, $1.00 turbo$0.42 standard
Best forLong clips, character setsShort clips, camera control

Seedance 2.5

ByteDance's 30-second video model with native audio, 30 reference images and new edit, extend and avatar modes.

장점

  • 30-second single-pass generations
  • Excellent character consistency from references
  • Video Edit and Extend workflows
  • Turbo tier for budget runs

단점

  • Standard tier costs more per second
  • No dedicated motion-control mode
  • Slower on long clips

Kling 3.0

Kuaishou's flagship with Pro and Standard tiers, 3-15 second clips, optional sound and a Motion Control mode.

장점

  • Fluid, physically believable motion
  • Motion Control from a reference video
  • Lower cost for short clips
  • Fast generation

단점

  • 15-second maximum
  • Fewer reference inputs
  • Audio is an add-on that raises the price

종합 평가

For 5-10 second product and social clips with controlled motion, Kling 3.0 is the efficient pick. For long-form storytelling, multi-reference characters and editing existing footage, Seedance 2.5 is ahead. Most teams on MakeInfluencer.ai keep both and pick per shot.

FAQ

자주 묻는 질문

관련 페이지

더 보기

MakeInfluencer.ai에서 두 도구 모두 사용해보세요

여러 모델로 AI 영상을 생성하세요 — 모두 하나의 플랫폼에서.

몇 분 만에 시작 · 사용한 만큼만 결제