アイデア → ショートフィルム
映画を作る

GPT Image 2.5 vs Nano Banana Pro: Which Image Model Should You Use?

GPT Image 2.5 vs Nano Banana Pro compared on character consistency, text rendering, editing, resolution and price per image, with a practical verdict.

機能比較

機能GPT Image 2.5Nano Banana Pro
Max resolution4K4K
Reference images16Multiple
Text renderingExcellentGood
Character consistencyGoodExcellent
1K medium price (list)$0.024$0.14
SpeedFast (Flare)Moderate

GPT Image 2.5

OpenAI's September 2026 image models, Flare for fast generation and Sunburst for precision edits, up to 4K with xhigh and max quality.

メリット

  • Cheapest medium-quality tier of any frontier model
  • Best-in-class typography and layout
  • 16 reference images for edits
  • Very fast Flare variant

デメリット

  • Photoreal skin can look cleaner than real
  • Face consistency across large sets still trails Nano Banana Pro

Nano Banana Pro

Google's Gemini 3 Pro Image model with 4K output, multi-image consistency and multilingual on-image text.

メリット

  • Strongest character consistency
  • Photoreal skin and lighting
  • Reliable multi-reference edits

デメリット

  • About 6x the price of GPT Image 2.5 medium at 1K
  • Slower generations
  • Fewer aspect ratios

総合評価

Use Nano Banana Pro as the identity anchor for an AI influencer and GPT Image 2.5 Flare for everything that needs volume, text or speed. If you can only pick one for a mixed workload, GPT Image 2.5 now offers the better price-to-quality ratio.

よくある質問

よくある質問

関連ページ

もっと見る

MakeInfluencer.aiで両方のツールを試す

複数のモデルでAI動画を生成 — すべて1つのプラットフォームで。

数分で作成開始 · 従量課金